Skip to main content

Responsiveness and Slashing Policy

FP Validated's infrastructure posture is built for institutional delegators: clear alert ownership, bounded response expectations, and an explicit slashing accountability model.

:::info Public policy scope This page is a public operating policy. It intentionally describes commitments and escalation principles, not private alert routes, on-call identities, internal phone trees, or insurer contract details. :::

Responsiveness principles

FP Validated treats validator health alerts as operational commitments, not best-effort notifications.

Incident classExamplesResponse principle
Critical signing safetypossible double-sign risk, signer ambiguity, slashing indicator, validator key mismatchImmediate page; freeze automation and prioritize safety over uptime.
Critical livenessvalidator down, block production stopped, chain height not progressing for operated validatorPage on-call; begin triage within the critical response window.
Degraded servicepeer count low, RPC/API degraded, storage pressure, repeated restartsAlert routed to operator workflow; triage within the standard response window.
Observability gapexporter down, missing labels, scrape target missing, dashboard blind spotRestore visibility before declaring the workload healthy.
Informationalplanned maintenance, non-production test environment degradation, known upstream incidentTrack in the incident log and communicate if user impact is expected.

Response-time targets

FP Validated's target response windows are:

SeverityTarget acknowledgementTarget first actionNotes
SEV0 — signing safety / slashing risk15 minutes30 minutesSafety-first. Disable risky automation or signing paths before attempting availability recovery.
SEV1 — production validator liveness30 minutes1 hourRestore validator health or move into a documented mitigation path.
SEV2 — degraded API/RPC/monitoring4 hours1 business dayPrioritize based on delegator or integration impact.
SEV3 — non-production / planned work1 business dayScheduledHandled through normal change workflow.

The operating model is compatible with PagerDuty-style paging, Alertmanager routing, chat escalation, or an equivalent on-call tool. The important requirement is not the vendor; it is that critical alerts create a tracked acknowledgement, escalation, and evidence trail.

Slashing response policy

If slashing is suspected or confirmed, FP Validated follows a safety-first response:

  1. Freeze signing-risk automation — stop any automated action that could worsen equivocation or duplicate signing risk.
  2. Preserve evidence — capture validator state, signer topology, relevant alerts, chain evidence, deployment history, and recent changes.
  3. Determine scope — identify affected validator, chain, epoch/height range, delegator exposure, and whether the event is confirmed on-chain.
  4. Stabilize operations — keep the validator offline or in safe mode until signer state is unambiguous.
  5. Notify affected parties — communicate impact, preliminary scope, and next update window.
  6. Publish postmortem summary — provide a public-safe incident summary once root cause and mitigation are known.

Delegator compensation posture

For institutional trust, FP Validated's policy target is:

For delegated assets operated under FP Validated's validator responsibility, FP Validated targets 100% compensation for slashing losses attributable to FP Validated operational fault, funded through FP Validated reserves and/or slashing insurance as available.

This public target has three important boundaries:

BoundaryPolicy
Covered caseSlashing caused by FP Validated operational fault, signer misconfiguration, infrastructure error, or unsafe deployment process.
Excluded caseProtocol-wide bugs, upstream client defects not reasonably preventable, governance-driven penalties, delegator-side action, or force majeure may require separate review.
Funding pathFP Validated reserves first where applicable; slashing insurance is a planned/targeted institutional risk-control layer.

Until formal insurance is active, the public position should say "insurance planned / targeted", not imply an active policy exists.

Delegation-scale policy

Compensation and insurance planning should scale with delegated value.

Delegated scaleRequired control posture
Early / small delegationPublic runbook, monitoring, evidence capture, manual signer-safety checks.
Material delegationFormal incident SLA, documented compensation process, internal reserve allocation.
Institutional delegationInsurance or equivalent risk-transfer review, signed operating terms, named escalation path, periodic resilience evidence.

Public commitment wording

Use this wording externally:

FP Validated operates validators with monitored Kubernetes infrastructure, audited GitOps workflows, and a safety-first incident policy. Critical validator and slashing-risk alerts are routed to an on-call workflow with defined response targets. Where slashing is attributable to FP Validated operational fault, our policy target is to make affected delegators whole through FP Validated reserves and/or slashing insurance as the program matures.